10 Indicators of Living in a Police State: Are We There Yet?

Are you wondering if we are living in a police state? In this blog post, we will explore ten indicators that may suggest the presence of such a state. By examining various aspects of society, we can gain a better understanding of whether or not we have reached this troubling point in our history. Let’s delve into these indicators to assess where we stand.


In today’s digital age, concerns about living in a police state have become increasingly prevalent. With whistleblowers being targeted and charged with crimes, surveillance cameras aided by AI technology, and a sense that personal freedoms are being undermined, it begs the question: are we living in a police state? In this review, we will explore the thought-provoking video created by Magic Prepper, titled “10 Indicators of Living in a Police State: Are We There Yet?”.

Whistleblowers are being targeted and charged with crimes

The video brings attention to the concerning trend of whistleblowers being targeted and charged with crimes for their efforts to expose corruption and misconduct. It highlights high-profile cases such as Edward Snowden and Chelsea Manning, who faced severe consequences for revealing government secrets. This indicator raises important questions about the state’s commitment to transparency and accountability.

Surveillance cameras are everywhere, aided by AI technology

The ubiquity of surveillance cameras, coupled with advancements in artificial intelligence technology, is another indicator of living in a police state. The video illustrates how these cameras are no longer limited to public spaces; they pervade private spaces as well. Combined with AI capabilities, they can track and monitor individuals on an unprecedented scale, raising concerns about privacy and the boundaries of surveillance.

People feel that their votes no longer matter

The erosion of faith in the democratic process is a significant indicator evaluated in the video. Many people feel that their votes no longer hold weight, with power concentrated in the hands of politicians and special interest groups. This sentiment fuels skepticism about the efficacy of electoral processes and raises the need for electoral reform to restore public trust.

News outlets only tell viewers what they want them to hear

The video also examines the role of news outlets in shaping public opinion. It suggests that media outlets may selectively present information to manipulate public discourse. This form of media control raises concerns about the integrity of news reporting and the potential suppression of alternative viewpoints.

Free speech is being suppressed, with government involvement

The restriction of free speech is a critical indicator discussed in the video. It highlights instances where individuals have faced consequences for expressing dissenting opinions, both online and offline. This suppression of free speech, often with government involvement, raises concerns about the erosion of fundamental democratic principles.

The government monitors people’s phones and locations

The video sheds light on the invasive monitoring of private communications and locations by the government. It focuses on the use of surveillance technologies for mass data collection, emphasizing the potential encroachment on personal privacy. This indicator raises important discussions about striking a balance between security and civil liberties.

There is a never-ending war, perpetuated by the government

The perpetuation of a never-ending war is another indicator examined in the video. It discusses the military-industrial complex and its potential influence on foreign policies, suggesting that war becomes a profitable endeavor for vested interests. This raises concerns about the allocation of resources and the ethical implications of a continuous state of conflict.

Rights are being temporarily suspended

The video also touches upon the temporary suspension of rights in certain situations. It explores the notion of sacrificing civil liberties in the name of national security and the potential long-term consequences of such temporary measures. This raises questions about the balance between individual freedoms and collective safety.

There are prison camps where people are held

A chilling indicator discussed in the video is the existence of prison camps where individuals are held. It explores instances where people can be detained indefinitely without charges or access to proper legal representation. This raises concerns about due process and the treatment of detainees within these facilities.

Signing statements are used to bypass the legal process

Lastly, the video examines the use of signing statements as a way to bypass the legal process. It highlights how signing statements can override laws passed by Congress, potentially undermining the checks and balances essential for a functioning democracy. This indicator emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability in government decision-making.


“10 Indicators of Living in a Police State: Are We There Yet?” is a thought-provoking video that explores the signs of living in a police state. Through an examination of whistleblowers, surveillance, the erosion of democratic processes, media control, free speech suppression, mass surveillance, perpetual war, temporary suspension of rights, prison camps, and bypassing the legal process, the video raises important questions about the state of individual freedoms and the balance between security and civil liberties. Watching this video prompts viewers to critically reflect on the preservation of democratic principles and the need for vigilant citizenry.